🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.